Silicone versus Saline Implants

Breast augmentation has become the most popular cosmetic surgery in the U.S. in recent years. Beating out rhinoplasty or nose job, liposuction, and abdominoplasty or tummy tuck, breast augmentation has been a life-changing treatment for over 300,000 women each year since 2004. By simply checking breast augmentation patients’ before and after pictures and their testimonials on the Custom Silicone Rubber Internet, you will know why such procedure has been popular.

Getting the procedure is determined by the degree of dissatisfaction with one’s breasts. Because women are not created equal when it comes to breasts sizes, they often desire for improvement. As long as there are women who like to improve the size of their breasts, breast augmentation will never be a thing of the past.

Breast augmentation uses either saline or silicone breast implants. Before the procedure takes place, surgeons usually ask their patients if they prefer saline or silicone implants. Most patients are not fully aware of the difference between saline and silicone implants.

During consultations, surgeons show their patients a sample of saline and silicone implants. Each sample will be placed on their hand and the patient will then decide which of the two will be used in the breast augmentation Tampa plastic surgeons perform. Even after discussing the difference between saline and silicone, most women would often say, “I’d like to have silicone, Doc.” Why is this so?

Silicone implants used in breast augmentation Wesley Chapel plastic surgeons perform are much softer than saline ones. These are silicone shells filled with silicone gel placed either under your chest muscles or under your breast. Saline implants, on the other hand, are self sealing diaphragms filled with salt water solution. Silicone implants usually leave the patient with longer scars when they are placed in Oem Silicone the patient’s body.

Silicone implants was even banned by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1992 due to diseases associated with silicone implants in women. Saline, conversely, was approved by the FDA because of its minimal health risks compared with silicone. When it comes to maintenance, silicone breast augmentation Wesley Chapel plastic surgeons place requires the patient to undergo reoperation after 10 years to correct rupture and reshape the implants. Saline breast implants, however, do not require the patient to undergo reoperation as its rupture rate is only 3 to 10 percent within 10 years.

Silicon Technology Enables Replacement of Quartz

Crystal oscillators require a unique quartz resonator for each frequency. The crystal oscillator assembly process requires the quartz to be cut, x-rayed, lapped, mounted, and sealed into the final package . Fabrication of these resonators becomes increasingly difficult at frequencies over 100 MHz because the resonator must be manufactured to very tight tolerances.

The complexity of the manufacturing process is subject to poor yield at multiple steps within the process forcing material restarts and overall production delays.In addition to silicone bowl lead times, reliability is a chief concern with quartz oscillators. Quartz oscillators are susceptible to contamination which can affect both the center frequency and the ability of the XO to start up reliably. If an oscillator fails in the end application, often the entire system fails because the oscillator provides critical timing for the electronics.


The industry has long been searching for a technology that enables the replacement of quartz oscillators with a solution that addresses lead time and reliability concerns while providing Oem Silicone performance on par with quartz oscillators. Over the last several years, micro-electromechanical system (MEMS)-based oscillators have emerged as a possible replacement technology for quartz oscillators. MEMS-based oscillators provide an alternative solution to quartz by replacing the quartz oscillator with a CMOS-based mechanical resonator.